Today we will consider two methods of Varroa mites control, which are based on the destruction of mites that are in the process of reproduction in the brood of worker bees.
One of the
methods, namely the sealed brood removal method, has its roots in the
beekeeping traditions of
The second
method came to us from
Let's consider the pros and cons of both methods, which are so close in essence, and so different in execution ...
The brood
selection method is somewhat longer than the method of its destruction and
requires more resources. If the process of working with nest frames is
completely the same - you need to inspect the entire nest and to select all
frames with sealed brood, then further actions when shredding the brood are
easier and faster. You need to take a fork and quickly destroy the cells and
to damage the brood of bees. When removing
brood, it is necessary to select technical colonies for collecting brood and to
move the frames with the sealed brood in them. After that, it is necessary to
ensure the emergence of young bees from the brood in technical colonies in the
absence of new brood, and to treat them with natural acids or acaricides. At
the same time, the main families of the apiary will remain free of chemicals. When the brood is
destroyed, the procedure does not end there either ... Strips with amitraz are
placed in all hives with destroyed brood, which slowly evaporates and kills
some of the mites parasitizing on the bees.
Destroyed brood mixed with polen from neighboring cells becomes protein feed for worker bees, who will clean and restore destroyed cells, simultaneously throwing out dead mites ... But, there is a high probability that the founding female mites in the destroyed cells will not die completely, but will climb on worker bees, who will come to restore these cells ... That is why it is impossible to talk about the real effectiveness of this method. Ideally, it should be equal to the effectiveness of using amitraza in a family without brood, that is, about 80-90 %% ...
The efficiency of removal of sealed brood for families from which it is removed, is approximately 80%, but it can be even higher when removal of the brood is made at the moment of the first mass entry of the mites into the brood cells for reproduction, when almost all sexually mature wintered females and young females born in winter and early spring if the winter was warm enough ... For technical families, the processing efficiency is also 80-90 %%, depending on what medicine was used .
It is advisable to use both methods on bee families with sufficient strength after leaving wintering. Destruction and removal of sealed brood shifts the development of colonies by 10-15 days, depending on the number of removed or destroyed combs with brood ... Therefore, in both cases, it is important that bee families have enough food, bee bread and bees to accelerate the rearing of a new generation of young bees.
But these two methods have one significant difference ... If during the destruction of the brood you lose a huge number of future bees, then during the removal of the brood, all these bees will be saved and new colonies can be created from them or the very colonies from which we selected them, can be strengthened. This way the apiary will be more efficient and will collect more honey and give more packages. In addition, when rearing queens, such powerful prefabricated families can be used as a families-rearers for new queens! The removal of the old queen, the exit of all young bees from the cells with their subsequent processing with acids or acaricides, in fact, without any additional operations, turn these technical families into the families-rearers of the queens!
It is important to add here that both of these methods, according to our calculations, will not be effective in a one-time applying and will be only more or less effective in a two-time applying ... This is what we see in practice. Varroa mites from apiaries do not disappear, and at best they only subside until next spring. Let's show this with a simple arithmetic calculation ...
If in the spring of this year there were 100 mites in a family of bees, then processing them in any way with an efficiency of about 85% will reduce their number to 15 pieces. For 6 months of active reproduction, the mites population will grow 2 in the sixth degree times (doubling every month according to scientists) or in 64 times, and if you are not lucky, then in 128 times. Thus, by the end of the season, there will be from 1000 to 1900 mites in the bee colony. With a one-time treatment, 5% per month will die during the winter, or an average of 30%, and in the spring there will be from 700 to 1200 mites in the family, and this will result in death for the bee family in the spring or in the beginning of summer. With a double-time treatment with an efficiency of about 85%, only from 150 to 220 mites will remain by winter, which, after a decrease of 30% during the wintering period, will ensure in spring the presence in the bee family from 100 to 150 mites. Basically, we're back to where we started ... even a little worse ...
That is why
we say that any of the currently existing methods ensures only the preservation
of bees and mites in such a way that the bees more or less survive, and the
mites continue to feed the manufacturers of chemical preparations! Thus, we
believe that the only way to win this battle without watering the bees with
bipin ( amitras-based preparation) seven times per season, as some Belarusian
producers of packages and honey do, is to reduce the rate of mites reproduction
between spring and autumn treatments - that is, in summer! And this is the main
goal of our Apivox Varroa Eliminator project.
No comments:
Post a Comment